User talk:Forestfarmer

Welcome to my discussion
ようこそForestfarmerのノートに

Rusk[edit]

Forestfamerさん、こんにちわ。ラスク文書での孤軍奮闘、お疲れ様です。私も援護せねばと思い、日本語版のラスク書簡のページを簡単に訳して載せてみました。ヒマな時チェックしてみてください。奴らがどんな反応するか楽しみですが。（全削除されそうな気が・・・）--Junmai 15:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ありがとうございます。貴方のした事を無駄にしないようにがんばって編集していきます。--Forestfarmer 11:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning[edit]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry and didn't know 3RR.I will not break that rule.thank for your caution --Forestfarmer 11:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gratitude[edit]

I hereby award this **Working Man's Barnstar** to **Forestfarmer** for tireless and endless work on fixing Japan-related articles--Questionfromjapan 11:33, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your gratitude.I don't thought the person giveing an award for me.I think it is the most giving thanks to your gratidude to write

"but I'm glad"

ありがとうございます。まさか私を評する人がいるとは考えていませんでした。こうゆう時の最大の答辞としては、

意外とうれしい

かな。--Forestfarmer 13:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ForestFarmer[edit]

Junmaiです。久しぶりにきてみたらメチャクチャ項目が充実しててさらに保護までかかっててびっくりしました。素晴らしい。感激しました。説得力のある記事に仕上がっていて、今後の竹島問題の世論の風向きが変わりそうな気がしますよ。Forestfarmerさんの功績ははかりしれんほど大きいですよ。ごくごく微力ながらForestfarmerさんのターゲット記事を私もチェックして積極的に拙い英語で頑張ってみます。--Junmai 13:42, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Forestfarmer さん, Ginnre です[edit]

Here is the evidence. From [1].

その間、日本人と日本海軍は朝鮮の于山島（獨島）を「松島」と呼んできた。しかし「松島」が朝鮮の「鬱陵島」に名づけられたので、朝鮮の于山島（獨島）にフランス捕鯨船がつけた名である "Liancour Rocks"をとり、獨島（于山島）を「リアンクール岩」と呼び『朝鮮水路誌』にもそのように表示し始めた。

　　そうなると、海軍省水路局に大きく依存する日本漁民たちも次第に海軍省の呼称にしたがうようになり、1880年代からは日本では朝鮮の「于山島（獨島）」を「リアンクール岩」に、「鬱陵島」を「松島」と呼称するようになった。

　　しかるに日本漁夫たちは「リアンクール岩」が長く呼びづらいので、これを「リャンコ島」と略称した。従来、日本人が「鬱陵島」につけた「竹島」は消え去り、とんでもないことに 1905年１月28日、日本の内閣会議では朝鮮の「于山島（獨島）」に「竹島」という日本の呼称をつけたのであった。

レスポンスについて[edit]

「ですよ」とかForestfarmerさんが書きましたが、外国人を外人にしたのはぼくではないですね。最初に例のプロジェクトを作ったのは日本人の利用者のHattoなのです。彼について行こうとしてアメリカ人のNihonjoeが「外国人」という言葉遣いでそのプロジェクトのテンプレートなどを作ってくれました。いままで「外人」を差別用語として使われたこともあるだろうと思いますが、僕たち日本人の目からした外国人にはそういった差別をほとんど感じていないのです。毎日、電車の中で「あっ！外人だ！」、テレビで「外人タレントのボビーさん」などなど外人という言葉は一般的に使われているので、差別用語にするとしたら僕はそこで怒るべきだと言うことではないでしょうか？言葉は悪いと思わせるようになったら、悪くなるのだと僕は思います。

とは言ってもやはりウィキペディア的には外人のような言葉は使わない方がいいでしょう。Isn'tとcan'tよりもIs notとcan notを使うことが多い（と言うか全てなんですかね）のでForestfarmerさんがGaijin talentというプロジェクトをGaikoku-jin talentにしたいのなら、僕は賛成します。 freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 05:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn'tって外人っぽいのですか。ありがとうございます。以後気をつけます。学校で習わない事なので感謝します。関係詞のthatも多分そうなんでしょうね。外人って差別的意図が無いのに差別的な扱いを受ける典型なんです。気になったので書いたまでです。ま、私が感じたという事は多分ほかの日本人も感じているけど書いてないだろうなぁって思いました。--Forestfarmer 12:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ところでですね、今ForestfarmerさんのContributionsを見ますとよく頑張ってるなあと思いました。目標が良さそうので失礼ですがもし必要であれば僕はForestfarmerさんの書き込みを綺麗な英語に直したいのです。History of Japanなどは大きくて問題がいっぱいあるので大変だろうと思うけど、Eso, Kanroku, Ekanのような、小さくて大事な記事を特に注目したい。以降同じような記事を綺麗に伝えたいと思ったら、僕のトークへお越しください！ freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 11:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

早速ノートに書かしてもらいました。よろしくお願いします。--Forestfarmer 12:53, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

実は文章的に関係代名詞を使わなくてもフォーマルさがほとんど変わらないこともあります。けれど分かりやすさにとっては使った方がいいかもしれない。先ほどAide-de-camp to the Emperor of Japanにcopyeditをしてなかなかいいstubが出来たのではないかと。確かに武官は英語でmilitary officerと言います。僕が変えたところを見て下さい（日本語のテンプレートとウィキリンクなど）。

What I can learn about Japanese history by editing your articles, you can learn about English Wikipedian style : ). freshofftheufo ΓΛĿЌ 00:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oyo321[edit]

Jeez. That's one heck of a pissed retort you wrote to Goodfriend on the History of Japan article. I don't see how Goodfriend has made such a belligerent remark to get under your skin. It certainly doesn't help. Oyo321 22:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for advice. but i fight with him many times. and I am accustomed of him doing because He opposes my insistence each time.--Forestfarmer 23:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about image:Suyan rock.png in Japanese Wikipedia article ja:蘇岩礁[edit]

I added GNU coyright note in this image, I do not understand why you say unclear, please double check.--Yeahsoo 21:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what is the image created from ? I want to know The source in the map used.It is written usually like Image:Antarctica base(Japan) English ver.png.--Forestfarmer 06:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--You should change yout socotra rock image, country names should be People's Republic of China and Republic of Korea. This is common sense. For my picture, souce is own work.--Yeahsoo 09:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes,thanks.I fixed.--Forestfarmer 14:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rusk Documents[edit]

Please don't use disingenuous or misleading edit summaries, as here. I didn't remove the link, which is still included under References. But the text you added is not very coherent, and as far as I can tell, it duplicates topics that are already in the article. Perhaps you could explain what you find missing in the article as it stands, and we can discuss how to expand it. Thanks. --Reuben 02:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC) (revised)[reply]

Project deletion[edit]

As you have participated in WikiProject Gaijin Tarento, you should be aware of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Gaijin tarento. Please go participate there if you wish. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 04:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked you (and several other contributors) for 24 hours for edit warring on Liancourt Rocks ([2], [3]). Please note that there is a strict zero-tolerance policy against edit-warring in place on that article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By Air[edit]

Hello Forestfarmer. How do you do? For your information, an anon, 211.108.10.9, seems to be him.[4] --Nightshadow28 (talk) 14:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Dokdo is protected.he is a troublesome man.anyway,thanks you for your telling.--Forestfarmer (talk) 17:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Kifu[edit]

Template:Kifu has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Thinboy00's ~~sockpuppet~~ alternate account 17:14, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Report of Van Fleet Mission to Far East until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 03:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]